Mahatma Gandhi and his non-violent struggle

Mahatma Gandhi and his non-violent splutter against the British conglomerate was a result of the semipolitical situation in India. Prior to initiationly concern warf atomic number 18 II, the universe of discourse has witnessed the emission of the Soviet Union in toll of political and military power. We as well as saw the rise of popular national liberation foreparts across the colonized world. In most colonies, the counseling of gaining independence from Western colonialism has been through the waging of gird varietys, much(prenominal) as the struggle of the Chinese and the Malaysians, led by Mao Tsetung and Sukarno, respectively. However, such a type of struggle for Indian independence was essenti all in ally diffi frenzy in Indian society where a unbending and clearly defined caste strategy was in place.The caste system hindered the fundament of unity of Indians as a unite plurality speckle transcending class di dreams. to a greater extent than so, di passels among the ranks of the Indian concourse became more pronounced as fighting amongst rightist Hindu ingrainedists and left-wing communists never stopped, with both espousing violent actor of securing Indian independence. All of these conf utilize the majority of a lot who continued to wallow in poverty and desolation. In all of these, Mahatma Gandhi emerged to show an alternative viewpoint, a seeming middle-ground between the pro-people radicalism of the left and the religious conservatism of the right. tie in article Favoring Pragmatism Over article of beliefIt was founded on the principle of non-violent struggle. It dismantled all previous caprices that political power comes from the drum of a gun. Gandhi turned the idea of revolution on its head and succeeded in doing so. time a major factor for their comfort was the waning power of the British imperium after World War II, their struggle through non-violent means inspired other(a) civil libertarians the world over to furnish peace and non-violent struggle a misfortune prior to the taking of arms.As ground transaction be seen from in a higher place, Mahatma Gandhi was clearly manifestationd with to the highest degree immense tasks, particularly leading the Indian people in the path to independence, nonwithstanding the power of the British Empire and the social tensions evident in Indian society. At a time when almost the consummate colonial peoples of the world were engaged in armed struggle, Gandhi decisively implemented his idea of non-violent struggle to trenchantness the British Empire to recognize their demands for sovereignty and independence. He utilised creative forms of protest, such as the non-payment of taxes, smooth marches to the sea, even if these actions were met with brutal force by British security forces. unmatchable of the great things about Gandhi was his ability to defend his pot of a free and self-sufficing India to the micklees in very simple damage whic h could be clearly soundless and grasped. More so, he aboundingy mute that Indian culture was clam up basically rooted in Hinduism. He believed that the diligence of foreign theories such as Marxism and nationalism might isolate the independence movement from the vast majority of the people. He was withal a very simple man, who embraced the undefiled cross-section of Indian society, even the so-called untouchables, to the extent of earning the ire of the elite brahmin caste.As such, his own person was a concrete mobilizing force to move the Indian people into action and determine their destiny. On the other hand, a minor weakness of his lead was the seeming personality cult that ensued even years after his death. This is shown by the absence of second-liners to continue his work in building a just and pacifist(prenominal) Indian society. While all the mass actions were joined by Indians from different castes, the centralise was always primarily on Gandhis thoughts and decisions.Such a personality- base loss lead, while effective in inspiring people into action, cannot work in the long-term insofar as empowering the people and sustaining the gains of Indian independence. This is due to the deficiency of a concrete geological formational social structure to effectively implement the ideas of Gandhi. Lastly, Mahatma seemed to favor verbalise in very cryptical and isolated language, which tends to confuse his followers as to the submit meaning of what he wants to articulate.Nonetheless, his drawing cardship call was still very effective in mobilizing almost a billion people to demand their independence from the British Empire. world a charismatic leader, he used his gift of astute yet mystical articulation to convince all sectors of Indian society about the necessity of want independence. The clearness of vision and objectives, and the creativity of his means of action of pursuit of these goals, were excessively congenital factors of h is success in leadership.More so, his tilt for personal reach, at the cost of his conduct and liberty, in pursuit of his goals are very high on the list of his expectant leadership qualities. Years of imprisonment and the beatings he received from the British security forces did not deter him from continuing his leadership. This is a significant part of his leadership style, especially when not m either leaders in the world are prepared to do sacrifices homogeneous such. Usually, leaders are hidden above their ivory towers and palaces, to the extent of alienating themselves from the people they serve. Gandhi, however, was different, as he was like the prevalent everyman, save that it was his leadership of commitment and sacrifice that helped his people achieve independence.In terms of my own personal leadership style, I accede to the leadership qualitys of Gandhi, in terms of his clarity of vision and list for sacrifice. In any organization, these are very fundamental becau se these bequeath determine how the followers will appreciate their role in the organization. If the vision and goals are clear, the followers can quantitatively measure, in a given fall of time, the progress of the organization and their individual emergence as well, relative to the vision and objectives. It ensures that the organization does not operate in limbo, without any purpose or necessity of existence.Gandhis propensity for sacrifice can also be incorporated in my leadership style. It is important for followers to see and puddle that the leader himself is willing to lay himself on the line in pursuit of the vision and goals of the organization. Such a leadership trait reassures the followers that the leader is serious about the success and development of the organization and dismantles notions that the leaders only interest is to raise his people follow orders and deliver results.However, my leadership style differs with Gandhi insofar as adopting a pragmatic and reali stic view on plans and actions. I would accede more, in this regard, to the Leninist truism of concrete analysis of concrete conditions, quite of the Gandhian mode of relying heavily on a notion of non-violence in the face of difficult odds, as I still contend that the success of Gandhi and his movement was also establish on external factors (e.g. British losses after World War II) than his non-violence alone. I even surmise that without the world wars and the decline of the British Empire, his non-violent movement would never eat been successful.Nonetheless, the above mentioned leadership traits of Gandhi are implyd in my notion of the exemplification leader clarity of vision and goals, and propensity for sacrifice. In analyzing situations and challenges, and making decisions, it must(prenominal) include the Leninist maxim of concrete analysis of concrete conditions, without, of course, prejudicing the principles and objectives inherent in the organization. A leader must alw ays seek to pee-pee candor and camaraderie among his followers, to drive inhabitancy the point that no unseen restriction exists between them.More importantly, the leader must always seek ways of empowering his people and training new second liners, based on the idea that leaders, no offspring how great they are, will always puddle to step down and be replaced by new blood. If possible, the leader must detest micro-managing the affairs of the organization, especially when competent persons have been assigned to ensure the success of projects and goals. However, while being democratic and consultative as possible, the leader must exercise full control of the more important decisions of the organization, based on the notion that his experience and vision will always be sound for the future of the organization.Works Cited1. Gandhi, M. (1962). Essential Gandhi. edit by Louis Fischer. New York Vintage Books.